Maximum trademark applications
are not approved on their first go-around as per the USPTO trademark
statistics. Only a few applications receive a “first action approval”. This
means that Office Actions are published against the huge majority of
trademark applications. While the reasons for Online Trademark Registration application rejections are several,
they fall under two categories usually:
- Refusal of registration and
- Non-substantive problems
Non-substantive problems are
quite straightforward and cheap to resolve, with the exemption of doubtful trademark
provisions. Instances of non-substantive problems comprise requests for
amendments or further information in regards to the following:
- identification of services and goods
- background on the connotation of the mark in a foreign language or in the industry
- explanation of the mark if a stylized logo is involved
Significantly more cost and
effort will be necessary to overcome a substantive denial to get your trademark
registered. Instances of substantive grounds for refusing a trademark
application comprise:
- likelihood of confusion with a previous filed or registered trademark (i.e., your mark is too alike to someone else’s mark filed prior to your application);
- failure to point out function or source as a trademark
- merely descriptive mark (i.e., your mark explains a feature, characteristic or quality of the goods or services recognized in your application); and
Tips to minimize or avoid
trademark rejections
Prior to filing your Trademark registration application, know
that certain pre-filing measures can decrease the risk of substantive and
non-substantive denials significantly. Here are some tips.
If you are brainstorming, exclude
those marks that seem descriptive or generic of your products. You should also sort
out phrases or words that seem to offer only informational matter, and be
deficient in the prospective to become a source identifying brand that will
differentiate your company.
The identification of goods and
services will necessitate careful contemplation. You wish to use depictions
that not only match to USPTO trademark benchmarks, but would also reduce going
beyond with the services/goods of any related registered marks.
One possibly serious error is recognizing
several goods or services in a use-based application when, in fact, the
applicant has not yet used the mark on all the products identified in the
application. There is no offense in recognizing several goods/services in
an Intent-To-Use application, but such a mistake in a use-based
application can result in void registration if not rectified in time.
To lessen the hazard of a
probability of perplexity rejection, a triumph search of the USPTO
trademark file must be performed prior to filing your trademark application. Looking
for the precise mark in the same class is quite simple, but searching for other
marks that may be considered as confusingly similar necessitates some
experience and skill.
Tips to respond to trademark
application refusals successfully
No comments:
Post a Comment