Maximum trademark applications
are not permitted on their first go-around according to the USPTO
trademark statistics. Only a few applications get a “first action approval”. This
indicates that Office Actions are published against the huge majority
of trademark applications. While the causes for Online Trademark Registration application refusals are numerous,
they fall under two categories usually:
- Non-substantive problems and
- Refusal of registration
Non-substantive issues are quite
clear-cut and inexpensive to fix, with the exception of uncertain trademark
provisions. Examples of non-substantive issues comprise requests for alterations
or further information in regards to the following:
- recognition of services and goods
- background on the suggestion of the mark in a foreign language or in the industry
- clarification of the mark if a stylized logo is entailed
Considerably more effort and cost
will be essential to overcome a substantive denial to get your trademark registered.
Examples of substantive grounds for refusing a trademark application include:
- likelihood of confusion with an earlier filed or registered trademark (i.e., your mark is too alike to an individual’s mark filed prior to your application);
- failure to identify function or source as a trademark
- merely descriptive mark (i.e., your mark clarifies a feature, quality or characteristic of the goods or services renowned in your application); and
Tips to lessen or avoid
trademark rejections
Before filing your Trademark registration application, know
that definite pre-filing measures can lessen the risk of substantive and
non-substantive denials considerably. Here are some guidelines.
If you are thinking, leave out
those marks that seem descriptive or generic of your products. You should also reform
phrases or words that seem to offer only informational matter, and be lacking
in the prospective to become a source recognizing brand that will discriminate
your company.
The recognition of goods and
services will require careful consideration. You want to use representations
that not only go with USPTO trademark benchmarks, but will also decrease going
beyond with the goods/services of any associated registered marks.
One possibly serious error is
recognizing numerous goods or services in a use-based application when, in
fact, the candidate has not yet used the mark on all the products recognized in
the application. There is no wrongdoing in recognizing numerous goods/services
in an Intent-To-Use application, but such an error in a use-based
application can result in void registration if not repaired in time.
To lessen the risk of a likelihood
of bewilderment rejection, a triumph search of the USPTO trademark
file should be carried out prior to filing your trademark application. Searching
for the precise mark in the same class is quite easy, but searching for other
marks that might be considered as confusingly similar necessitates some skill
and experience.
Tips to react to trademark
application refusals productively
In
spite of planning beforehand and carefully staying away from drawbacks, you may
get an Office Action. It may be of somewhat console, but it helps to remember
that USPTO trademark examining legal representatives are not robots sticking to
a stable formula or pattern. The challenge is to encourage the human examiner
that your Trademark Registration Service
is allowable.
No comments:
Post a Comment